A recently-filed lawsuit handled by attorneys Andrew Miltenberg and Damon Cheronis demonstrates how school administrators tend to overcorrect. According to the complaint, Loyola University Chicago allegedly granted a no-contact order based on an interview and without any follow-up investigation to make up for “losing a student’s sexual assault complaint.”

Loyola used the single-investigator model “wherein a single individual both investigates and adjudicates the claim.” In a case that seemed to turn mostly on credibility, Loyola’s investigator also had a hard time granting Doe’s cross-examination questions:

The complaint also mentions a survey illuminating the lack of support accused students receive, compared to the generous and zealous support received upon accusers:

The lawsuit was just filed and the university has yet to respond.

We’ve added this lawsuit to our Title IX Lawsuits Database and will update it accordingly.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

Support Our Work

If you like our work, consider supporting it via a donation or signing up for a database.

About the Author

Jonathan Taylor is Title IX for All's founder, editor, web designer, and database developer.

Related Posts

More from Title IX for All

Accused Students Database

Research due process and similar lawsuits by students accused of Title IX violations (sexual assault, harassment, dating violence, stalking, etc.) in higher education.

OCR Resolutions Database

Research resolved Title IX investigations of K-12 and postsecondary institutions by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).

Attorneys Directory

A basic directory for looking up Title IX attorneys, most of whom have represented parties in litigation by accused students.

A recently-filed lawsuit handled by attorneys Andrew Miltenberg and Damon Cheronis demonstrates how school administrators tend to overcorrect. According to the complaint, Loyola University Chicago allegedly granted a no-contact order based on an interview and without any follow-up investigation to make up for “losing a student’s sexual assault complaint.”

Loyola used the single-investigator model “wherein a single individual both investigates and adjudicates the claim.” In a case that seemed to turn mostly on credibility, Loyola’s investigator also had a hard time granting Doe’s cross-examination questions:

The complaint also mentions a survey illuminating the lack of support accused students receive, compared to the generous and zealous support received upon accusers:

The lawsuit was just filed and the university has yet to respond.

We’ve added this lawsuit to our Title IX Lawsuits Database and will update it accordingly.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

Support Our Work

If you like our work, consider supporting it via a donation or signing up for a database.

About the Author

Jonathan Taylor is Title IX for All's founder, editor, web designer, and database developer.

Related Posts

More from Title IX for All

Accused Students Database

Research due process and similar lawsuits by students accused of Title IX violations (sexual assault, harassment, dating violence, stalking, etc.) in higher education.

OCR Resolutions Database

Research resolved Title IX investigations of K-12 and postsecondary institutions by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).

Attorneys Directory

A basic directory for looking up Title IX attorneys, most of whom have represented parties in litigation by accused students.