According to an update from Barbara Kay, writing for the Canadian publication the National Post:

Ryerson administration has confirmed that the university will be absorbing the cost of the additional security for the February 6 CAFÉ event. According to a staffer, Ryerson president Sheldon Levy felt the cost was a barrier to freedom of expression.

Well done, Mr. Levy. Not to mention everyone who urged the administration to reconsider.

As I mentioned in a recent post, Ryerson U decided to fine the Canadian Association for Equality a $1,600 “security fee” for sponsoring a lecture by men’s advocate Karen Straughan (aka GirlWritesWhat). This was due to the string of criminal activity on the part of Feminist protesters who attempted to shut down and silence the speakers CAFE had sponsored at the University of Toronto.

The decision by Ryerson U administrators was met with resistance on the part of men’s advocates:

Remember, folks: the proper way to oppose bad speech is by exercising better speech, not censorship. Censorship tends to work out contrary to the intentions of the censors. This is true in this case as well; Ryerson itself has contributed to the controversy of the event. Now more people will be interested in attending and seeing what the message of men’s human rights is about.

The event will be held on the sixth of this month, exactly two days from now. You can watch a live stream of the event on YouTube here when it happens.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

About the Author

Jonathan Taylor is a Title IX advisor, the founder of Title IX for All, and the creator of its databases on Title IX litigation and enforcement.

Related Posts

According to an update from Barbara Kay, writing for the Canadian publication the National Post:

Ryerson administration has confirmed that the university will be absorbing the cost of the additional security for the February 6 CAFÉ event. According to a staffer, Ryerson president Sheldon Levy felt the cost was a barrier to freedom of expression.

Well done, Mr. Levy. Not to mention everyone who urged the administration to reconsider.

As I mentioned in a recent post, Ryerson U decided to fine the Canadian Association for Equality a $1,600 “security fee” for sponsoring a lecture by men’s advocate Karen Straughan (aka GirlWritesWhat). This was due to the string of criminal activity on the part of Feminist protesters who attempted to shut down and silence the speakers CAFE had sponsored at the University of Toronto.

The decision by Ryerson U administrators was met with resistance on the part of men’s advocates:

Remember, folks: the proper way to oppose bad speech is by exercising better speech, not censorship. Censorship tends to work out contrary to the intentions of the censors. This is true in this case as well; Ryerson itself has contributed to the controversy of the event. Now more people will be interested in attending and seeing what the message of men’s human rights is about.

The event will be held on the sixth of this month, exactly two days from now. You can watch a live stream of the event on YouTube here when it happens.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

More from Title IX for All

Advisors for Accused Students

We can help you craft and execute a defense strategy at any stage—from report to investigation to adjudication—with the goal of achieving the best possible outcome.

Accused Students Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims.

About the Author

Jonathan Taylor is a Title IX advisor, the founder of Title IX for All, and the creator of its databases on Title IX litigation and enforcement.

Related Posts

Accused Student? Speak With a Title IX Advisor

Accused Students Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims. Also includes data on regulations, attorneys, schools, courts, and judges.

OCR Resolutions Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims. Also includes data on regulations, attorneys, schools, courts, and judges.