Judge approves disabled veteran’s lawsuit against university for anti-male bias

Harnois v. University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth is perhaps the best-litigated pro-se lawsuit of its kind to date

Kansas prosecutors to drop charges of false rape report

DA Charles Branson “believed in the merits of the case,” but dropped charges since it “could discourage sexual assault victims from coming forward

Accused on campus: John Does push for right to cross-examine

This article references, among others, the landmark decision Doe v. Baum

5 college Title IX lawsuits to watch

Including the recent verdict favoring the plaintiff in Doe v. Boston College

Title IX changes remain unimplemented nearly a year after proposal

They have recently been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review before publication, however

ACLU: Why Pennsylvanians should vote “no” on Marsy’s Law

“…a constitutional amendment that its supporters say would give crime victims ‘co-equal’ rights to those of the accused.”

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

About the Author

Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.

Related Posts

Judge approves disabled veteran’s lawsuit against university for anti-male bias

Harnois v. University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth is perhaps the best-litigated pro-se lawsuit of its kind to date

Kansas prosecutors to drop charges of false rape report

DA Charles Branson “believed in the merits of the case,” but dropped charges since it “could discourage sexual assault victims from coming forward

Accused on campus: John Does push for right to cross-examine

This article references, among others, the landmark decision Doe v. Baum

5 college Title IX lawsuits to watch

Including the recent verdict favoring the plaintiff in Doe v. Boston College

Title IX changes remain unimplemented nearly a year after proposal

They have recently been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review before publication, however

ACLU: Why Pennsylvanians should vote “no” on Marsy’s Law

“…a constitutional amendment that its supporters say would give crime victims ‘co-equal’ rights to those of the accused.”

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

More from Title IX for All

Advisors for Accused Students

We can help you craft and execute a defense strategy at any stage—from report to investigation to adjudication—with the goal of achieving the best possible outcome.

Accused Students Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims.

About the Author

Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.

Related Posts

Accused Student? Speak With a Title IX Advisor

Accused Students Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims. Also includes data on regulations, attorneys, schools, courts, and judges.

OCR Resolutions Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims. Also includes data on regulations, attorneys, schools, courts, and judges.