Every month, we distribute a “Title IX Recap,” providing a highlight of the previous month’s litigation, advocacy, and other Title IX-related matters. As always, more information on any lawsuits by accused students or Title IX OCR resolutions will be found in our Accused Students Database and OCR Resolutions Database respectively.

“The Education Department now plans to issue both of its final Title IX rules by March 2024, almost a year after its original May 2023 goal.”

“The investigation was biased because the surgeon was a man, while his counter-accuser was a woman, the plaintiff alleged.”

“Is there a scenario in which March is realistic as opposed to April/June? It’s possible but not likely.”
Petitioners sought to challenge the Supreme Court of California holding that private universities are not required to perform live hearings or cross-examination in Title IX disciplinary proceedings.
A line of questioning during a recent oral argument by a panel of skeptical and concerned judges. Are you convinced by Emory’s response?
Wrongly found responsible for sexual misconduct, a New York court has ordered him reinstated and awarded withheld salary “from the date of his termination through the date of his reinstatement.” A win for the attorneys at Allen Harris PLLC.
One of our busiest years, largely dedicated to improving our resources for the next era of the Title IX debate, has come to a close.
Allegations: Jane Roe falsely accused Jane Doe of sexual misconduct. The university performed a biased investigation, so Doe felt she had no choice but to request mediation. This lawsuit seeks to enforce a settlement between Doe and Roe that CWRU allegedly interfered with.
“While the Constitution gives people the right to remain silent and not testify in criminal proceedings without having that silence held against them, the same is not true in university sexual misconduct or civil legal proceedings.”
Any disciplinary proceeding that relies on biased personnel cannot itself be relied on to produce unbiased results.
Doe has also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to “restrain and enjoin Defendant University of Maryland College Park (“College Park”) from suspending him and barring him from campus and participating in school activities.”
More evidence that “studies” programs – especially gender studies – are ideological rather than academic in nature.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

Support Our Work

If you like our work, consider supporting it via a donation or signing up for a database.

About the Author

Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.

Related Posts

More from Title IX for All

Accused Students Database

Research due process and similar lawsuits by students accused of Title IX violations (sexual assault, harassment, dating violence, stalking, etc.) in higher education.

OCR Resolutions Database

Research resolved Title IX investigations of K-12 and postsecondary institutions by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).

Attorneys Directory

A basic directory for looking up Title IX attorneys, most of whom have represented parties in litigation by accused students.

Every month, we distribute a “Title IX Recap,” providing a highlight of the previous month’s litigation, advocacy, and other Title IX-related matters. As always, more information on any lawsuits by accused students or Title IX OCR resolutions will be found in our Accused Students Database and OCR Resolutions Database respectively.

“The Education Department now plans to issue both of its final Title IX rules by March 2024, almost a year after its original May 2023 goal.”

“The investigation was biased because the surgeon was a man, while his counter-accuser was a woman, the plaintiff alleged.”

“Is there a scenario in which March is realistic as opposed to April/June? It’s possible but not likely.”
Petitioners sought to challenge the Supreme Court of California holding that private universities are not required to perform live hearings or cross-examination in Title IX disciplinary proceedings.
A line of questioning during a recent oral argument by a panel of skeptical and concerned judges. Are you convinced by Emory’s response?
Wrongly found responsible for sexual misconduct, a New York court has ordered him reinstated and awarded withheld salary “from the date of his termination through the date of his reinstatement.” A win for the attorneys at Allen Harris PLLC.
One of our busiest years, largely dedicated to improving our resources for the next era of the Title IX debate, has come to a close.
Allegations: Jane Roe falsely accused Jane Doe of sexual misconduct. The university performed a biased investigation, so Doe felt she had no choice but to request mediation. This lawsuit seeks to enforce a settlement between Doe and Roe that CWRU allegedly interfered with.
“While the Constitution gives people the right to remain silent and not testify in criminal proceedings without having that silence held against them, the same is not true in university sexual misconduct or civil legal proceedings.”
Any disciplinary proceeding that relies on biased personnel cannot itself be relied on to produce unbiased results.
Doe has also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to “restrain and enjoin Defendant University of Maryland College Park (“College Park”) from suspending him and barring him from campus and participating in school activities.”
More evidence that “studies” programs – especially gender studies – are ideological rather than academic in nature.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

Support Our Work

If you like our work, consider supporting it via a donation or signing up for a database.

About the Author

Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.

Related Posts

More from Title IX for All

Accused Students Database

Research due process and similar lawsuits by students accused of Title IX violations (sexual assault, harassment, dating violence, stalking, etc.) in higher education.

OCR Resolutions Database

Research resolved Title IX investigations of K-12 and postsecondary institutions by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).

Attorneys Directory

A basic directory for looking up Title IX attorneys, most of whom have represented parties in litigation by accused students.