“The Education Department now plans to issue both of its final Title IX rules by March 2024, almost a year after its original May 2023 goal.”

“The investigation was biased because the surgeon was a man, while his counter-accuser was a woman, the plaintiff alleged.”

“Is there a scenario in which March is realistic as opposed to April/June? It’s possible but not likely.”
Petitioners sought to challenge the Supreme Court of California holding that private universities are not required to perform live hearings or cross-examination in Title IX disciplinary proceedings.
A line of questioning during a recent oral argument by a panel of skeptical and concerned judges. Are you convinced by Emory’s response?
Wrongly found responsible for sexual misconduct, a New York court has ordered him reinstated and awarded withheld salary “from the date of his termination through the date of his reinstatement.” A win for the attorneys at Allen Harris PLLC.
One of our busiest years, largely dedicated to improving our resources for the next era of the Title IX debate, has come to a close.
Allegations: Jane Roe falsely accused Jane Doe of sexual misconduct. The university performed a biased investigation, so Doe felt she had no choice but to request mediation. This lawsuit seeks to enforce a settlement between Doe and Roe that CWRU allegedly interfered with.
“While the Constitution gives people the right to remain silent and not testify in criminal proceedings without having that silence held against them, the same is not true in university sexual misconduct or civil legal proceedings.”
Any disciplinary proceeding that relies on biased personnel cannot itself be relied on to produce unbiased results.
Doe has also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to “restrain and enjoin Defendant University of Maryland College Park (“College Park”) from suspending him and barring him from campus and participating in school activities.”
More evidence that “studies” programs – especially gender studies – are ideological rather than academic in nature.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

About the Author

Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.

Related Posts

“The Education Department now plans to issue both of its final Title IX rules by March 2024, almost a year after its original May 2023 goal.”

“The investigation was biased because the surgeon was a man, while his counter-accuser was a woman, the plaintiff alleged.”

“Is there a scenario in which March is realistic as opposed to April/June? It’s possible but not likely.”
Petitioners sought to challenge the Supreme Court of California holding that private universities are not required to perform live hearings or cross-examination in Title IX disciplinary proceedings.
A line of questioning during a recent oral argument by a panel of skeptical and concerned judges. Are you convinced by Emory’s response?
Wrongly found responsible for sexual misconduct, a New York court has ordered him reinstated and awarded withheld salary “from the date of his termination through the date of his reinstatement.” A win for the attorneys at Allen Harris PLLC.
One of our busiest years, largely dedicated to improving our resources for the next era of the Title IX debate, has come to a close.
Allegations: Jane Roe falsely accused Jane Doe of sexual misconduct. The university performed a biased investigation, so Doe felt she had no choice but to request mediation. This lawsuit seeks to enforce a settlement between Doe and Roe that CWRU allegedly interfered with.
“While the Constitution gives people the right to remain silent and not testify in criminal proceedings without having that silence held against them, the same is not true in university sexual misconduct or civil legal proceedings.”
Any disciplinary proceeding that relies on biased personnel cannot itself be relied on to produce unbiased results.
Doe has also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to “restrain and enjoin Defendant University of Maryland College Park (“College Park”) from suspending him and barring him from campus and participating in school activities.”
More evidence that “studies” programs – especially gender studies – are ideological rather than academic in nature.

Thank You for Reading

If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:

More from Title IX for All

Advisors for Accused Students

We can help you craft and execute a defense strategy at any stage—from report to investigation to adjudication—with the goal of achieving the best possible outcome.

Accused Students Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims.

About the Author

Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.

Related Posts

Accused Student? Speak With a Title IX Advisor

Accused Students Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims. Also includes data on regulations, attorneys, schools, courts, and judges.

OCR Resolutions Database

A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims. Also includes data on regulations, attorneys, schools, courts, and judges.