Every month, we distribute a “Title IX Recap,” providing a highlight of the previous month’s litigation, advocacy, and other Title IX-related matters. As always, more information on any lawsuits by accused students or Title IX OCR resolutions will be found in our Accused Students Database and OCR Resolutions Database respectively.
As of this posting, the below numbers are our current tallies of lawsuits and resolved investigations as tracked in our Title IX Lawsuits and OCR Resolutions databases.
“A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals agreed with Doe that DU’s representation of its process was specific enough to create an enforceable contract, and that the institution had a duty to use reasonable care when investigating and disciplining Doe.” Doe v. Denver University et al and its critical files can be found in our Title IX Lawsuits Database.
“The Education Department’s publication of a draft rule in the Federal Register will trigger a public comment period, typically 60 days. Once the department reviews this feedback, it will finalize a regulation.”
The school “failed to provide sufficient interim and supportive measures to respondents accused of Title IX-related misconduct.” The investigation’s resolution agreement and letter can be found in our OCR Investigations Database.
“Large-sample study involving almost a million students finds that sex differences are universal across dozens of countries and cultures — sex can be predicted by academic interests and abilities.” Noteworthy findings: “Universal patterns in academic sex differences are larger than hitherto thought” and “Academic sex differences are stronger in societies with more socioeconomic equality.”
“Under this definition, a single unwanted request for a date, a joke, and even discussions of serious sexual topics in class another student might find unpleasant or disagreeable, can be deemed ‘sexual harassment.’”
Chief Judge Pratt has not historically been friendly to accused-students-turned-plaintiffs. Her recent decision continues that overall trend. Doe v. University of Southern Indiana and its critical files can be found in our Title IX Lawsuits Database.
“The Pomona advocates are seeking to provide trauma-informed training for judges and investigators on sexual misconduct cases while ensuring that every survivor has access to a lawyer provided by their institution”
Thank You for Reading
If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:
Support Our Work
If you like our work, consider supporting it via a donation or signing up for a database.
About the Author
Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.
We provide affordable advisory services in defense of students and faculty wrongly accused of misconduct. Contact us by filling out the form below or calling (903) 309-0332. Learn more here.
Research due process and similar lawsuits by students accused of Title IX violations (sexual assault, harassment, dating violence, stalking, etc.) in higher education.
A basic directory for looking up Title IX attorneys, most of whom have represented parties in litigation by accused students.
Every month, we distribute a “Title IX Recap,” providing a highlight of the previous month’s litigation, advocacy, and other Title IX-related matters. As always, more information on any lawsuits by accused students or Title IX OCR resolutions will be found in our Accused Students Database and OCR Resolutions Database respectively.
As of this posting, the below numbers are our current tallies of lawsuits and resolved investigations as tracked in our Title IX Lawsuits and OCR Resolutions databases.
“A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals agreed with Doe that DU’s representation of its process was specific enough to create an enforceable contract, and that the institution had a duty to use reasonable care when investigating and disciplining Doe.” Doe v. Denver University et al and its critical files can be found in our Title IX Lawsuits Database.
“The Education Department’s publication of a draft rule in the Federal Register will trigger a public comment period, typically 60 days. Once the department reviews this feedback, it will finalize a regulation.”
The school “failed to provide sufficient interim and supportive measures to respondents accused of Title IX-related misconduct.” The investigation’s resolution agreement and letter can be found in our OCR Investigations Database.
“Large-sample study involving almost a million students finds that sex differences are universal across dozens of countries and cultures — sex can be predicted by academic interests and abilities.” Noteworthy findings: “Universal patterns in academic sex differences are larger than hitherto thought” and “Academic sex differences are stronger in societies with more socioeconomic equality.”
“Under this definition, a single unwanted request for a date, a joke, and even discussions of serious sexual topics in class another student might find unpleasant or disagreeable, can be deemed ‘sexual harassment.’”
Chief Judge Pratt has not historically been friendly to accused-students-turned-plaintiffs. Her recent decision continues that overall trend. Doe v. University of Southern Indiana and its critical files can be found in our Title IX Lawsuits Database.
“The Pomona advocates are seeking to provide trauma-informed training for judges and investigators on sexual misconduct cases while ensuring that every survivor has access to a lawyer provided by their institution”
Thank You for Reading
If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:
Support Our Work
If you like our work, consider supporting it via a donation or signing up for a database.
About the Author
Title IX for All is a U.S.-based organization that advocates fairness and equal treatment in education. Our main activities are database development, writing, counseling, publishing, research, public speaking, and networking.
Research due process and similar lawsuits by students accused of Title IX violations (sexual assault, harassment, dating violence, stalking, etc.) in higher education.
