In the video above you will see a boy sitting in a desk, with his back essentially against a wall. The girl is in his face the whole time. She is constantly yelling at him, screaming obscenities, mocking him, waving her arms in front of his face in a highly provocative and antagonistic manner, spitting on him, and even explicitly daring him to hit her.
The video is hard to watch. It portrays a totally undisciplined girl with absolutely no sense of class and dignity. Class in this sense, of course, is not a socioeconomic condition, but an attitude. The boy protests – without yelling – but never lays a finger on her. Apparently this infuriates her even more, so she rushes at him, grabs him, strikes him repeatedly, and they both go to the floor.
The “fight,” if you can call it that (there was no exchange of blows, just the girl beating on him), was broken up by another female student jumping in the middle of them.
Throughout most of the video you can see the teacher (a woman) standing behind the girl, doing nothing, and seeming to wonder whether to get involved at all. Later she is seen walking around nonchalantly as if nothing happened, or as though this is an everyday occurrence in her classroom.
Of course, security should have been called, and she should have been removed from the classroom – at least until she cooled off. In the comments section of the YouTube video, however, one woman suggested that the boy should have been removed from the classroom:
So let me see if I understand this correctly: if a violent and obscene girl is about to assault a schoolboy, he should be removed from the classroom. It’s his education that should be interrupted. Why? Because we need to help the violent, obscene girl.
This is what happens when we live in a society in which girls are taught that they can do whatever they want to boys, whenever they feel like it, and that boys are at fault if they merely defend themselves: you get more and more violent girls.
And I’ll bet that the girl in this video grew up in a single-mother home listening to her mom carp on endlessly about how “she a strong and independent woman who don’t need no man,” about how “black men ain’t shit,” and so forth – various phrases that have become all too common among so-called “strong, independent women.”
The frequent tendency among educators to look the other way when it comes to female misbehavior is all the worse when we consider it in the context of what boys are punished for. Consider how a teacher in North Carolina reacted when a boy named Ryan Blackmon hugged her out of gratitude for her breaking up a fight. According to Ryan:
‘I said, ‘Thank you,’ after she got done,’ Blackmon told the station. ‘I went to hug her, then she just snatched me up by the arm and drug me to the other teacher and said that I needed to be written up, and that something serious had happened.’
He was suspended for sexual harassment for hugging her. For saying thank you. And unlike the teacher in the video above, Ryan’s teacher had absolutely no reservations about physically grabbing a hold of him and dragging him around the school.
That’s not all, of course. Our schools have suspended 9 year-old boys for “sexual harassment” for commenting that a teacher is “cute,” and a 6 year-old boy for singing “I’m sexy and I know it.” In some cases boys are even confined in are essentially boxes for hours on end. And these cases are just a drop in the bucket.
When a boy misbehaves – and even when they behave in a nonthreatening manner – the response is condemnatory, swift, and merciless. When females misbehave, no one cares.
But remember: according to Feminists, we need to ignore boys’ education issues because women are oppressed.
Yeah, right.
[mc4wp_form id=”18731″]
For a more in-depth look at the litigation movement for due process and equal access to education:
Thank You for Reading
If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:
Support Our Work
About the Author
Related Posts
7 Comments
Comments are closed.
In the video above you will see a boy sitting in a desk, with his back essentially against a wall. The girl is in his face the whole time. She is constantly yelling at him, screaming obscenities, mocking him, waving her arms in front of his face in a highly provocative and antagonistic manner, spitting on him, and even explicitly daring him to hit her.
The video is hard to watch. It portrays a totally undisciplined girl with absolutely no sense of class and dignity. Class in this sense, of course, is not a socioeconomic condition, but an attitude. The boy protests – without yelling – but never lays a finger on her. Apparently this infuriates her even more, so she rushes at him, grabs him, strikes him repeatedly, and they both go to the floor.
The “fight,” if you can call it that (there was no exchange of blows, just the girl beating on him), was broken up by another female student jumping in the middle of them.
Throughout most of the video you can see the teacher (a woman) standing behind the girl, doing nothing, and seeming to wonder whether to get involved at all. Later she is seen walking around nonchalantly as if nothing happened, or as though this is an everyday occurrence in her classroom.
Of course, security should have been called, and she should have been removed from the classroom – at least until she cooled off. In the comments section of the YouTube video, however, one woman suggested that the boy should have been removed from the classroom:
So let me see if I understand this correctly: if a violent and obscene girl is about to assault a schoolboy, he should be removed from the classroom. It’s his education that should be interrupted. Why? Because we need to help the violent, obscene girl.
This is what happens when we live in a society in which girls are taught that they can do whatever they want to boys, whenever they feel like it, and that boys are at fault if they merely defend themselves: you get more and more violent girls.
And I’ll bet that the girl in this video grew up in a single-mother home listening to her mom carp on endlessly about how “she a strong and independent woman who don’t need no man,” about how “black men ain’t shit,” and so forth – various phrases that have become all too common among so-called “strong, independent women.”
The frequent tendency among educators to look the other way when it comes to female misbehavior is all the worse when we consider it in the context of what boys are punished for. Consider how a teacher in North Carolina reacted when a boy named Ryan Blackmon hugged her out of gratitude for her breaking up a fight. According to Ryan:
‘I said, ‘Thank you,’ after she got done,’ Blackmon told the station. ‘I went to hug her, then she just snatched me up by the arm and drug me to the other teacher and said that I needed to be written up, and that something serious had happened.’
He was suspended for sexual harassment for hugging her. For saying thank you. And unlike the teacher in the video above, Ryan’s teacher had absolutely no reservations about physically grabbing a hold of him and dragging him around the school.
That’s not all, of course. Our schools have suspended 9 year-old boys for “sexual harassment” for commenting that a teacher is “cute,” and a 6 year-old boy for singing “I’m sexy and I know it.” In some cases boys are even confined in are essentially boxes for hours on end. And these cases are just a drop in the bucket.
When a boy misbehaves – and even when they behave in a nonthreatening manner – the response is condemnatory, swift, and merciless. When females misbehave, no one cares.
But remember: according to Feminists, we need to ignore boys’ education issues because women are oppressed.
Yeah, right.
[mc4wp_form id=”18731″]
For a more in-depth look at the litigation movement for due process and equal access to education:
Thank You for Reading
If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:
Support Our Work
About the Author
Related Posts
7 Comments
-
“So let me see if I understand this correctly: if a violent and obscene girl is about to assault a schoolboy, he should be removed from the classroom. It’s his education that should be interrupted. Why? Because we need to help the violent, obscene girl.”
I don’t think she quite said that. She said that one of two possibilities should happen.
1. The teacher should have been in front of the boy and talking the girl down.
or
2. Removed the boy to calm her down (AND CALLED FOR SECURITY).
Her first suggested possibility I don’t find problematic. The second suggested possibility I do find problematic, because as you implied his education would be interrupted because or her behavior.
-
Action Opportunity: End Discriminatory Double Standards and Pervasive Anti-Male Culture in Schools
TO:
SUBJECT:
End Discriminatory Double Standards and Pervasive Anti-Male Culture in Schools
BODY:
Department of Education Office of Civil Rights,
I just watched a video and read an article that exemplifies the double standards and pervasive anti-male culture at many American schools today.
“In the video above you will see a boy sitting in a desk, with his back essentially against a wall. The girl is in his face the whole time. She is constantly yelling at him, screaming obscenities, mocking him, waving her arms in front of his face in a highly provocative and antagonistic manner, spitting on him, and even explicitly daring him to hit her.
“Throughout most of the video you can see the teacher (a woman) standing behind the girl, doing nothing, and seeming to wonder whether to get involved at all. Later she is seen walking around nonchalantly as if nothing happened, or as though this is an everyday occurrence in her classroom.”
“Video: schoolgirl screams at, spits on, and assaults schoolboy…and the teacher just doesn’t care”
“Posted by: Jonathan Taylor”
This teacher tolerated a shocking level of abuse from this girl towards this boy, and it is clear in context she was just there observing in order to punish the boy if he reacted in response to being a victim of harassment and violence.
Pursuant to your duties under the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, I urge the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to enforce the federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis sex, by investigating the pervasive anti-male bias apparent in this school, and wherever else it is found.
Until you do, boys and men will continue to be victims of illegal gender based discrimination, harassment, and abuse in American educational institutions.
-
No doubt the young man is being “educated” about how women are harmed by domestic abuse, one should never hit a women and of course what is mentioned in the article about a “strong woman”, entitled to share her opinions and feelings with everyone. This girl is clearly a domestic assault perpetrator in the making. Go feminism!
-
this girl is in distress , she needs psychological help or may be a sexual relationship ?
-
Female teachers would usually enforce zero tolerance if the boy hit back, possibly laying criminal charges against him and if the female student claims he touched her whether true or not, he might end up on the Sex Offenders registry.
To tell you a little secret…female teachers and administrators here in Canada tend to have sex with some of the male students and bribe them at least $1,000 for the male victims as hush money. If you earned a dollar for every female teacher who is having inappropriate relation with a minor student in Canada and the USA you wouldn’t have to work for a month.
-
What video? There’s none posted. Seems to have been lost in the site change.
Comments are closed.
More from Title IX for All
Accused Students Database
Research due process and similar lawsuits by students accused of Title IX violations (sexual assault, harassment, dating violence, stalking, etc.) in higher education.
OCR Resolutions Database
Research resolved Title IX investigations of K-12 and postsecondary institutions by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).
Attorneys Directory
A basic directory for looking up Title IX attorneys, most of whom have represented parties in litigation by accused students.
“So let me see if I understand this correctly: if a violent and obscene girl is about to assault a schoolboy, he should be removed from the classroom. It’s his education that should be interrupted. Why? Because we need to help the violent, obscene girl.”
I don’t think she quite said that. She said that one of two possibilities should happen.
1. The teacher should have been in front of the boy and talking the girl down.
or
2. Removed the boy to calm her down (AND CALLED FOR SECURITY).
Her first suggested possibility I don’t find problematic. The second suggested possibility I do find problematic, because as you implied his education would be interrupted because or her behavior.
Yeah…I just don’t think #2 should be on the table at all.
Action Opportunity: End Discriminatory Double Standards and Pervasive Anti-Male Culture in Schools
TO:
ocr@ed.gov
SUBJECT:
End Discriminatory Double Standards and Pervasive Anti-Male Culture in Schools
BODY:
Department of Education Office of Civil Rights,
I just watched a video and read an article that exemplifies the double standards and pervasive anti-male culture at many American schools today.
“In the video above you will see a boy sitting in a desk, with his back essentially against a wall. The girl is in his face the whole time. She is constantly yelling at him, screaming obscenities, mocking him, waving her arms in front of his face in a highly provocative and antagonistic manner, spitting on him, and even explicitly daring him to hit her.
“Throughout most of the video you can see the teacher (a woman) standing behind the girl, doing nothing, and seeming to wonder whether to get involved at all. Later she is seen walking around nonchalantly as if nothing happened, or as though this is an everyday occurrence in her classroom.”
“Video: schoolgirl screams at, spits on, and assaults schoolboy…and the teacher just doesn’t care”
“Posted by: Jonathan Taylor”
http://boysmeneducation.com/video-schoolgirl-screams-at-spits-on-and-assaults-schoolboy-and-the-teacher-just-doesnt-care/
This teacher tolerated a shocking level of abuse from this girl towards this boy, and it is clear in context she was just there observing in order to punish the boy if he reacted in response to being a victim of harassment and violence.
Pursuant to your duties under the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, I urge the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to enforce the federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis sex, by investigating the pervasive anti-male bias apparent in this school, and wherever else it is found.
Until you do, boys and men will continue to be victims of illegal gender based discrimination, harassment, and abuse in American educational institutions.
No doubt the young man is being “educated” about how women are harmed by domestic abuse, one should never hit a women and of course what is mentioned in the article about a “strong woman”, entitled to share her opinions and feelings with everyone. This girl is clearly a domestic assault perpetrator in the making. Go feminism!
this girl is in distress , she needs psychological help or may be a sexual relationship ?
Female teachers would usually enforce zero tolerance if the boy hit back, possibly laying criminal charges against him and if the female student claims he touched her whether true or not, he might end up on the Sex Offenders registry.
To tell you a little secret…female teachers and administrators here in Canada tend to have sex with some of the male students and bribe them at least $1,000 for the male victims as hush money. If you earned a dollar for every female teacher who is having inappropriate relation with a minor student in Canada and the USA you wouldn’t have to work for a month.
What video? There’s none posted. Seems to have been lost in the site change.